Chrome · Browser extension

EvidenceClip: user-invoked supplier capture

With an explicit click, capture selected spec text and source URL into a buyer-owned review packet. Least-privilege access; no browsing-history harvesting.

Who pays and who might buy?

Customer: Small purchasing teams documenting vendor specifications

Acquirer hypothesis: Procurement software agency or niche software operator

Acquisition motives: Buy the head start · Strategic capability tuck-in

Minimum proof to seek

5 paying teams; 100 accepted capture packets; >=60% documented research-time reduction; permission/security review and real transfer path.

Competition and stop rule

Browser bookmarks, clipping tools and manual notes. Value must come from the purchasing workflow and structured evidence.

Stop when: Stop if broad browsing permissions or unauthorized data reuse are necessary, or buyers only want raw scrape volume.

Different tiers, different businesses

A $1k–$10k extension can be a useful original utility. A $10k–$50k business needs retained paid teams and a clean permissions/data-transfer story; a purchased install base is not permission to monetize browsing data.

Price against verified operating profit OR a buyer-confirmed payback/buy-versus-build case. The target price is a negotiation hypothesis, not a valuation.

The $1m version is a paid team workflow with reliable source capture and defensible retention. At $10m, procurement or PIM software may value a deeply integrated information-capture capability. A $100m thesis requires enterprise-scale workflow ownership or unique authorized data assets, not merely adding more browser permissions. These are distinct future business models, not 30–90-day valuation forecasts. The economics lab backsolves the selected price only after its assumptions are accepted.